भारत में विवाह, तलाक और उत्तराधिकार जैसे मुद्दों पर अलग-अलग व्यक्तिगत कानून लागू होते हैं। ऐसे में समान नागरिक संहिता की मांग फिर चर्चा में है। क्या UCC सभी नागरिकों को समान अधिकार देगा या धार्मिक-सांस्कृतिक स्वतंत्रता को चुनौती देगा? यही संतुलन इस लेख का प्रमुख प्रश्न है?

An article on legal framework and policy gaps in addressing political, medical and engineering white collar offences in India.

Justice, at its purest, is meant to illuminate truth. Yet, there are times when that very light casts shadows—where the innocent are condemned and the guilty walk free. Wrongful convictions are not just legal errors; they are psychological tragedies that scar individuals and corrode the moral fabric of society.

When we speak of justice in India, we often picture the courtroom — the arguments, the verdict, the gavel. Rarely do we imagine what follows: the slow decay of humanity behind the iron bars of a prison. Yet, justice does not end at conviction; it continues in the conditions of confinement. The idea of punishment in a constitutional democracy must harmonize with dignity, not diminish it.

In an age where every whisper becomes a headline and every trial a live broadcast, the courtroom of law often finds itself overshadowed by the court of media. The rise of “media trials” — where public opinion precedes judicial pronouncement — has deeply unsettled the foundations of fair justice. While the Constitution of India grants freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a), this freedom was never intended to override the presumption of innocence and the rig

On 21 July 2025 a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court (Hon'ble Justices Anil S. Kilor & Shyam C. Chandak) delivered a lengthy (reported ~671-page) judgment that quashed a 2015 special-court conviction of 12 persons for the 11 July 2006 serial blasts on Mumbai’s Western Railway local line.

When the highest court warns that delay can let “hardened criminals hijack the system”, it is not throwing rhetorical flourishes. It is pointing to a structural rot: justice delayed becomes justice denied — both to victims and to the accused who remain trapped in legal limbo. In this Vidhigyata Vyakhya, we unpack what the Court’s concern means in law and practice, why the National Investigation Agency (NIA) courts are part of the answer, and how reform can be structured.

Three lawyers—Advocates Prashant Upadhyay, Harsh Kushwaha, and Prashant Yadav—have filed a petition before the Madhya Pradesh High Court (Indore Bench) seeking the removal of sponsored advertisements and celebrity endorsements that promote online legal services. These ads, circulated via platforms like YouTube and Instagram, feature a popular actor in a judicial role urging viewers to "purchase the best online legal services" through fixed-price packages.

Impact of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 in India.

The Himachal Pradesh High Court drew a vital distinction: mere appreciation of another country—absent any disassociation or incitement—does not constitute sedition. The ruling highlights the need for evidentiary thresholds in BNS-based sedition allegations, especially when digital actions are involved. It also underscores procedural safeguards, discouraging unnecessary custody once the investigative process is complete.

Online abuse — from threatening messages and trolling to non-consensual sharing of intimate images and doxxing — destroys people’s dignity and safety. Indian law now provides clear criminal, data protection, and remedial routes to stop abuse, punish offenders, and seek compensation. In the post a practical, legally accurate guide is given which you can use or share.

The Supreme Court has issued an order barring law interns from entering its courtrooms on Mondays, Tuesdays, and Fridays. The decision was made following a request from the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) to address severe overcrowding on these designated miscellaneous hearing days.

Is dowry a goodwill gift or source of oppression wrapped as a gift to a bride from her family or a way of showing economic status for bride's family?

Case Name : Association for Democratic Reforms & Ors v. Election Commission of India (Public Interest Litigation challenging Bihar SIR...