Obscenity law in India operates at a complex intersection of constitutional morality, freedom of expression, and evolving cultural standards. With the rapid expansion of digital media, including stand-up comedy, online music platforms, and OTT streaming services, the traditional understanding of obscenity has been significantly challenged. This paper critically examines the legal framework governing obscenity in India.

The Sabarimala Temple Entry Case has once again become a subject of national discussion, not because a new judgement has been delivered, but because the issues arising from it remain unresolved before a larger bench of the Supreme Court of India. The “reference” in the context is crucial – it signifies that the court itself is reconsidering broader constitutional questions linked to religious practices and gender equality.

This paper provides a comparative analysis of preventive detention laws and also examines the preventive detention principle, sections and its interpretation. Moreover, it also covers the ambit, jurisdiction and authority of the act.

On March 11, 2026, the Supreme Court of India permitted the withdrawal of life-support from Harish Rana — a man who had remained in a persistent vegetative state for over a decade. The order is being widely described as the first judicially-authorised instance under the modern living-will / passive-euthanasia framework and has reignited national conversations on dignity, medical ethics, and law.

the Supreme Court—after a heavy brew of public protests, animal-rights defenders, and legal debates—comes out with a fair and humane solution on August 22, 2025. It says, "Let’s not crowd shelters; let the poor strays go back home after giving them a dose and a snip. But hey—we can’t let feeding just happen anywhere. Set up special feeding corners, put up signs and helplines, and let’s keep both humans and dogs safe."

The Supreme Court has issued an order barring law interns from entering its courtrooms on Mondays, Tuesdays, and Fridays. The decision was made following a request from the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) to address severe overcrowding on these designated miscellaneous hearing days.

The Supreme Court bench comprising of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan ordered that stray dogs in the National Capital Region (NCR) be immediately moved to dedicated shelters and not released back into localities, even after sterilization due to increasing incidents of rabies affecting infants, young children, and the elderly.